Readability Checker
Analyze readability with Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and Coleman-Liau scores.
Related Tools
Keyword Density Checker
Analyze word frequency, n-grams, and keyword density in any text.
Coming soonSubject Line Analyzer
Score email subject lines for length, power words, spam triggers, and mobile preview.
Coming soonMeta Tag Generator
Generate meta tags, Open Graph tags, and Twitter Card markup for any page. Real-time preview with copy and download.
Use tool →Heading Analyzer
Check your H1-H6 hierarchy for proper nesting and SEO structure.
Coming soonHow to Use the Readability Checker
Paste your text in the box above and click Analyze. You'll get four readability scores plus word and sentence statistics. More text gives more accurate results. A few sentences work, but a full article is better.
The scores measure different things. Flesch Reading Ease gives a 0-100 score where higher means easier. The other three estimate a U.S. grade level. For web content, aim for a Flesch score above 60 (8th-9th grade). Most popular online content sits between 60 and 70.
What Are Readability Scores?
Readability formulas estimate how hard a piece of text is to read. They use measurable properties: sentence length, word length, syllable count. Shorter sentences and simpler words score as more readable. None of them measure meaning, logic, or whether the writing is actually good.
Flesch Reading Ease is the most widely cited. It was developed by Rudolf Flesch in 1948. A score of 60-70 matches plain English. Scores below 30 are academic or legal writing. Scores above 90 are easily understood by an 11-year-old.
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level converts the same inputs into a U.S. school grade. A score of 8.0 means an 8th grader can understand it. Most newspapers write at an 8th-grade level.
Gunning Fog Index adds complexity by weighting words with three or more syllables. It tends to rate text higher than Flesch-Kincaid because long words get penalized more heavily.
Coleman-Liau Index uses letter count instead of syllable count. It's faster to compute and avoids the ambiguity of syllable counting rules. Results correlate closely with Flesch-Kincaid.